Overview :

It was not unusual to hear nice, intelligent Korean adults of all ages say as a major of fact, "GIs are never held to justice in Korea.  They just fly away to American, and there is nothing we can do about it."  Besides being accepted as gospel by Koreans of all ages, it was also taken as a given by Koreans of all stripe -- pro-American, anti-American, neutral, and non-political alike. 

What was hardest to accept about this conventional wisdom was that the seeds of information to the contrary of this myth were clearly available in their head.

When you hear this wisdom about GI crimes, just ask the speaker to give you some examples to help you understand.

If you press, they will tell you of a couple of infamous murders and other crimes.  If you check, even if you press them for details, you will probably see that they do in fact know the GIs in these crimes were --- arrested by Koreans, put on trial by Koreans, and found guilty by Korean judges.

Today, unlike when I was teaching Korean adults, the person telling you that GI Crimes, and Korea's inability to do anything about them, is one key reason Korean society is anti-USFK / US alliance can point to the 2002 Tank Accident/Murder and the 2000 Water Poisoning of 10 Million Seoul Citizens.

You can read my review of those two cases and decide for yourself if they are great tragedies of justice that excuse the myth of "no" GIs "ever" facing "Korean justice."

But, beyond those two cases, the examples of bastard GI Crimes Koreans have been able to tell me about have ALWAYS turned out to be examples that prove the exact opposite of what they desperately want to believe -- like the 1993 horrible Markle Murder Case.  Markle still sits in a Korean prison to this day (Dec. 2005).  The murder was brutal, but the GI was convicted, and in a Korean civilian criminal court, (something a Korean soldier criminal never faces, because they are always tried by the Korean military court system).

To cut this short, I can easily show you how utterly preposterous the incredible bullshit of GI Crimes Myth is in Korea by noting a Dec. 2003 editorial in one of Korea's top media conglomerates that produce The Korean Times.

Headline :  First Prosecution of US Soldier
Washington Should Respect Seoul's Decision for Ties

It boggles the mind.

How could a man paid a good salary, and having risen through the ranks as a journalist, not remember at least the most famous murders that led to convictions?

In a word :  Easily.

It makes no sense.

I had a few long time students who were with me through more than 1 well publicized GI Crimes - crimes in which we watched the criminal soldier get convicted in Korean court.

But, when the new one rose, these same students still found they could say nothing but, "GIs are never held to justice in Korea.  This will be the first time if the US government doesn't shield the soldier again...."

It makes no sense.

The only other time I've run across something so baffling is in the States with people who have racial prejudice and don't know it. 

I knew some people in high school who had one or two good friends they hung out with, invited to their home even, who were black, but they still found a way from time to time, when among white friends, that they "don't like black people." 

If you pressed them on it, they still couldn't get it....

It is that kind of mind block in Korea too.

What I am offering in these pages is what I know about GI Crimes and what I have been able to find. 

The English language Korean newspapers have online archives that go back to 1998-99. 

Much of what I found comes from US media archives --- and keep in mind these papers don't spend much time on day to day things in South Korea beyond the geopolitical.  It is a safe bet more GI Crimes came and went and were not covered by them at all. 

Whatever the case may be, it is undeniable the Myth of GI Crimes in Korea is unsupported and ultimately inexcusable.

To think differently, you have to stretch out the hand of understanding Korean society beyond the bounds of normalcy.   

 

 

The Case :

From : The Washington Post - 3 July 1968 - page A 17 column 1

Murder and Arson

Crime occurred in Feb. 1968.

GI : H. K. Smallwood - 21 years old

Victim :

Strangled a Korean prostitute then setting fire to the room to cover the crime.

Verdict : Found Guilty

Sentence : as of the first trial - 15 years.

The O'Sullivan Site has information about this case and the SOFA of that period.  O'Sullivan is married to a Korean and spent a very long time in Korea in Kunsan. 

In January 1968, 1st Lt John D. Rock became the first officer convicted by a Korean court under the ROK-SOFA agreement. Lt. Rock convicted of illegally reselling 3 diamond rings (worth $3,500) purchased in the PX in violation of Korean customs laws. Given 3 months imprisonment (suspended), $730 fine and confiscation of rings. Lt Rock appealed and acquitted of violation of customs laws, but guilty of obstruction of ROK law enforcement and given 6 months sentence (suspended).

On 1 July, SP4 H.K. Smallwood Jr. of 8FASCOM sentenced to 15 years in Seoul District Court for the murder of a Korean women on 28 Feb 68. The was the longest sentence to date.

At year end, the Ministry of Justice exercised jurisdiction over 43 persons -- 16 military, 22 civilians and 5 dependents. Of this number, 4 were returned to military control; 12 are pending trial; 2 are pending appeal and 25 are completed. There were no acquittals and judgements were considered reasonable.

Notes from article

It notes the US-SK SOFA was never ratified by the US Senate as were the ones with NATO members but was put into practice through special act of the executive office.

It also notes that some USFK members had complained to the government about abuses in the Korean system of justice and the Korean government had started fact finding investigations.

The sources, speaking unofficially in a press interview had said that legal guarantees written into the US Sough Korean accord are not being observed, and that underpaid jurists are susceptible to bribes.

The US Command in South Korea has stressed that these opinions did not represent the official US view, but the Seoul District Court Prosecutor's Office and the Korean Bar Association are conducting separate inquiries.

Article goes on to tell about an interview with the Senior Prosecutor.

Moon said he particularly wants to find the lawyer the US sources said had asked his American client for $1,000 to "buy presents" for the judge.

Article and interview goes on to note how the Korean criminal court system at the time tended to have members who were still influenced by the Japanese colonial legal system that considered it the duty of the defense to prove the innocence of the accused even though Korea's post-colonial law stated all suspects were innocent until proven guilty.

Further Notes from O'Sullivan's Site

1970 was the third year the SOFA was in effect. Since the start of the SOFA, ROK courts had exercised jurisdiction in 193 cases or 3.5 percent of the original cases. In 1970 one of the first two prisoners sentenced under the SOFA was released from Suwon Penitentiary. Pvt Willie Page was released after serving 17 months of a 2-3 1/2 year sentence for rape resulting in injury. Another soldier SP4 Velasquez convicted of the same crime was released in 1969. At year end, the Ministry of Justice exercised jurisdiction over 29 individuals -- 14 military and 15 civilians. Serious crimes included rape, robbery and murder. Of this 15 were pending trial and five appeal with no acquitals.